Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11525971
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #42
Your Warcraft III Username: Brado
Violator's Warcraft III Username: dr.sciacca
Violated Rule(s): Do not ruin the game on purpose: Do not refuse to learn/and or cooperate: this does not mean being new/bad is bannable.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 12:27
Any further thoughts: Player is clearly not the best, which is fine if "new" but instead decided to not learn from mistakes. Ended up feeding and forcing a loss on purpose
[DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- Ziadoma
- Treant
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:50 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: [DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net
Since this is the same game as this banrequest: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=136787, in which you reported fumanchu for the same reason as dr.sciacca in this banrequest, I am writing about both here. (quotes are taken from both requests)
This are the stats from them after the game:
These players do not look like new players from the way they play. Despite that I do not see any intentional feeding or action which leads to the thought that they are ruining this game on purpose. As you said they both do not look like the best players and on top of that they are having bad matchups. This leads to them having a bad game and dying multiple times.
This refers to a situation where Furion dies in the same position, while farming jungle. You can not say:" get smarter" and expect them to be smarter. You probably have more experience at DotA than these guys do. I still think furion just played bad but still had no intention of losing on purpose.
Regardless of Slark say the following, he did play normal and tried to win:
I would like to put the attention on sticky44 (Abaddon) and Brado(Leshrac) constantly harassing Furion and Slark verbally in this game.
On top of that sticky44 tried to votekick furion after dying.
Leshrac flamed him three times in this game, however Abaddon's flame was very exzessiv and offensive. Being better than other players does not give you the right to flame others. The only reason Abaddon tried to kick Furion was for dying and having a bad game, which makes this votekick abusive.
So if someone here should get a punishment it is the Abaddon.
This are the stats from them after the game:
Code: Select all
dr.sciacca Slark 2/10/3
fumanchu Furion 1/9/4
These players do not look like new players from the way they play. Despite that I do not see any intentional feeding or action which leads to the thought that they are ruining this game on purpose. As you said they both do not look like the best players and on top of that they are having bad matchups. This leads to them having a bad game and dying multiple times.
Brado wrote:[...]instead decided to not learn from mistakes
[...]returns to the same tree locked location and feeds
This refers to a situation where Furion dies in the same position, while farming jungle. You can not say:" get smarter" and expect them to be smarter. You probably have more experience at DotA than these guys do. I still think furion just played bad but still had no intention of losing on purpose.
Regardless of Slark say the following, he did play normal and tried to win:
(15:11 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: one more word and i feed on purpose
(18:28 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: idc
(18:33 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: just want u loose
I would like to put the attention on sticky44 (Abaddon) and Brado(Leshrac) constantly harassing Furion and Slark verbally in this game.
Spoiler!
On top of that sticky44 tried to votekick furion after dying.
(27:26 / Allied) sticky44: !votekick fum
Leshrac flamed him three times in this game, however Abaddon's flame was very exzessiv and offensive. Being better than other players does not give you the right to flame others. The only reason Abaddon tried to kick Furion was for dying and having a bad game, which makes this votekick abusive.
So if someone here should get a punishment it is the Abaddon.
Join the Battleships Discord!
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests