[DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Brado
Basic Tree
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:22 am

[DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net

Postby Brado » Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:31 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11525971
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #42
Your Warcraft III Username: Brado
Violator's Warcraft III Username: dr.sciacca
Violated Rule(s): Do not ruin the game on purpose: Do not refuse to learn/and or cooperate: this does not mean being new/bad is bannable.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 12:27
Any further thoughts: Player is clearly not the best, which is fine if "new" but instead decided to not learn from mistakes. Ended up feeding and forcing a loss on purpose

User avatar
Ziadoma
Treant
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:50 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: [DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net

Postby Ziadoma » Mon Oct 22, 2018 8:31 pm

Since this is the same game as this banrequest: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=136787, in which you reported fumanchu for the same reason as dr.sciacca in this banrequest, I am writing about both here. (quotes are taken from both requests)
This are the stats from them after the game:

Code: Select all

dr.sciacca Slark  2/10/3
fumanchu   Furion 1/9/4

These players do not look like new players from the way they play. Despite that I do not see any intentional feeding or action which leads to the thought that they are ruining this game on purpose. As you said they both do not look like the best players and on top of that they are having bad matchups. This leads to them having a bad game and dying multiple times.
Brado wrote:[...]instead decided to not learn from mistakes
[...]returns to the same tree locked location and feeds

This refers to a situation where Furion dies in the same position, while farming jungle. You can not say:" get smarter" and expect them to be smarter. You probably have more experience at DotA than these guys do. I still think furion just played bad but still had no intention of losing on purpose.
Regardless of Slark say the following, he did play normal and tried to win:
(15:11 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: one more word and i feed on purpose
(18:28 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: idc
(18:33 / Allied) Dr.Sciacca: just want u loose


I would like to put the attention on sticky44 (Abaddon) and Brado(Leshrac) constantly harassing Furion and Slark verbally in this game.
Spoiler!
These are just some examples:
(11:55 / Allied) Brado: LOL slark
(11:57 / Allied) Brado: is so bad
(12:27 / Allied) Brado: fucking brain dead
(12:43 / Allied) sticky44: u just suck and greedy
(14:48 / Allied) sticky44: run u little faggot slark picker
(15:21 / Allied) sticky44: because ur a little bitch?
(16:14 / Allied) sticky44: slark u are shit
(18:47 / Allied) sticky44: sounds like a little bitch to me :D
(19:04 / Allied) sticky44: he's goign to make another account like the bitch he is
(22:33 / Allied) Brado: cuz slark
(22:36 / Allied) Brado: is going to throw the game
(25:57 / Allied) sticky44: shit team
(29:10 / All) sticky44: kick fur
(29:39 / Allied) Brado: fucking prophety
(32:55 / All) sticky44: slark being a little bitch because he couldnt get kills

On top of that sticky44 tried to votekick furion after dying.
(27:26 / Allied) sticky44: !votekick fum

Leshrac flamed him three times in this game, however Abaddon's flame was very exzessiv and offensive. Being better than other players does not give you the right to flame others. The only reason Abaddon tried to kick Furion was for dying and having a bad game, which makes this votekick abusive.
So if someone here should get a punishment it is the Abaddon.

User avatar
Ziadoma
Treant
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:50 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: [DOTA] dr.sciacca - europe.battle.net

Postby Ziadoma » Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:40 am

Denied.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests