Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11615982
Game Name: [ent] hellhalt td #43
Your Warcraft III Username: samcrow
Violator's Warcraft III Username: A_R_R_O_W, hunterdk, carrymesuck, ilearnthisgame all@entconnect
Violated Rule(s): Arrow extremely hard game ruin. 25 games played at the time of this game and 100% leak level 1, and trolling on afterthat.
Arrow didnt build lvl 1, 9, trolled everything else.
Other 3 refusing to kick.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): From lvl 1
Any further thoughts:
I got a 5 day ban for ''ruining'' for this viewtopic.php?f=24&t=137170&p=531081&hilit=samcrow#p531081.
I think a 1 year ban is in order here for arrow since this is way more sincere then what i did at the time.
Others should get around 10 days by your standards.
A_R_R_O_W, hunterdk, carrymesuck, ilearnthisgame all@entconnect
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: A_R_R_O_W, hunterdk, carrymesuck, ilearnthisgame all@entconnect
Nothing to add execpt for the fact that it was very very clear and admitted by Arrow that indeed he was AFK, then still to refuse to kick is just a poor way of playing.
please analyse and give your best judgement which ofcourse I will respect in any case... imo this was an unfair game
please analyse and give your best judgement which ofcourse I will respect in any case... imo this was an unfair game
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:45 pm
Re: A_R_R_O_W, hunterdk, carrymesuck, ilearnthisgame all@entconnect
Hi,
For the mod here is my thought process ( CarryMeSuck)
They didnt pause wave 1 when they saw he was afk, and he was back before w2.
So basicly he was there when asked to kick, the reason for kicking then changed to him being a noob(not building what they prefer that he does)
- since i dont know what would be considered a rule break, as our most knowledge player claimed that kicking a guy for being afk when he is not is not allowed, and neither is kicking for being a noob. Therefore i atleast chose to sustain.
Regarding Crows, he was leaking us information about a_r_r_o_w_s units and playstyle, which gave us information we could use if we wanted to, that i believe goes under "ghosting" which he also was currently banned for before so he should know better. Personally i think he could have listened to our opinions and accepted that we disagree, instead of countinuously leaking info on their own player
For the mod here is my thought process ( CarryMeSuck)
They didnt pause wave 1 when they saw he was afk, and he was back before w2.
So basicly he was there when asked to kick, the reason for kicking then changed to him being a noob(not building what they prefer that he does)
- since i dont know what would be considered a rule break, as our most knowledge player claimed that kicking a guy for being afk when he is not is not allowed, and neither is kicking for being a noob. Therefore i atleast chose to sustain.
Regarding Crows, he was leaking us information about a_r_r_o_w_s units and playstyle, which gave us information we could use if we wanted to, that i believe goes under "ghosting" which he also was currently banned for before so he should know better. Personally i think he could have listened to our opinions and accepted that we disagree, instead of countinuously leaking info on their own player
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 7:21 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: A_R_R_O_W, hunterdk, carrymesuck, ilearnthisgame all@entconnect
The dude leaked 100 creeps each wave. You could send any wave and have success with it.
Last edited by samcrow on Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests