Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11739591
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #97
Your Warcraft III Username: Krocis
Violator's Warcraft III Username: neophyte856
Violated Rule(s): not following team calls
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): not sending 5 on time to take inc, saving lumber when we called 8, not sending on time to take inc when we send 10, not sending lvl 12 at all
Any further thoughts: ignoring team so he cudnt cooperate properly=INTENTIONAL TK
[LTD]neophyte856
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 739591.w3g
Throughout the game, it is quite clear that you were actively discussing as a team which levels would be best to send and which levels you are going to send on. Although you did not say the word "send" it was evident that it was you intended to do. For some reason, he appears to be not working as a team.
Throughout the game, it is quite clear that you were actively discussing as a team which levels would be best to send and which levels you are going to send on. Although you did not say the word "send" it was evident that it was you intended to do. For some reason, he appears to be not working as a team.
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
!support for this request
Not his first time. He does this quite often. This guy neophyte856 never sending on time or not sending at all.
Also rarely ever talks and if you try to advice him or get explanation for his acts he ignores you.
Verry unpleasant being to play with.
Not his first time. He does this quite often. This guy neophyte856 never sending on time or not sending at all.
Also rarely ever talks and if you try to advice him or get explanation for his acts he ignores you.
Verry unpleasant being to play with.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
oceano wrote:!support for this request
Not his first time. He does this quite often. This guy neophyte856 never sending on time or not sending at all.
Also rarely ever talks and if you try to advice him or get explanation for his acts he ignores you.
Verry unpleasant being to play with.
It doesn't matter if u think he needs a spanking or not. Post a ban request for incidents u mention here or its completely irrelevant.
- Krocis
- Treant
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
SnowwyWolf wrote:http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11739591.w3g
Throughout the game, it is quite clear that you were actively discussing as a team which levels would be best to send and which levels you are going to send on. Although you did not say the word "send" it was evident that it was you intended to do. For some reason, he appears to be not working as a team.
Totally irelevant review 3/4 players did follow team calls 1 guy missed every send either on time or not sending at all.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
Krocis wrote:SnowwyWolf wrote:http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=11739591.w3g
Throughout the game, it is quite clear that you were actively discussing as a team which levels would be best to send and which levels you are going to send on. Although you did not say the word "send" it was evident that it was you intended to do. For some reason, he appears to be not working as a team.
Totally irelevant review 3/4 players did follow team calls 1 guy missed every send either on time or not sending at all.
I'm pretty sure you misunderstood me here, I am agreeing with the guy who posted the report...
-
- Treant
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: [LTD]neophyte856
User banned 2 days for refusing to cooperate.
@Krocis sometimes it can take longer to process BRQ's, we get to them as quickly as we can.
@Krocis sometimes it can take longer to process BRQ's, we get to them as quickly as we can.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests