Biased decisions

[omgitsen]

on that side note I admit I failed on haha! I thought it meant list of MY usernames that people might recognize.

[eldryan]

on that side note I admit I failed on haha! I thought it meant list of MY usernames that people might recognize.

it did.

[omgitsen]

now I am confused. You just listed people that recognize me haha

[eldryan]

now I am confused. You just listed people that recognize me haha

don't worry. that wasn't really @ OP.

[doomgolian]

Yes and for the record, I do agree with your statement of better replays could have been uploaded.

[iightfyre]

I will look into your app again for further consideration. I will watch some replays at random of yours and revisit your stats. Please hang tight and give me some time to accomplish this. Expect more answers from me tonight.

Thanks for your patience and bringing this to light, we take all complaints seriously and I will look into this for you omgitsen.

[omgitsen]

Thank you iight

[iightfyre]

I have watched 3 replays and here are my findings:

First replay: You started witch aqua build and I was impressed but then you never adapted to hold lvls 5, 7, 13, 14 or 17. The use of mass oceanus with no tank and ascendants behind them makes me worry. Then using sword mages instead of rerolling also it not a good move imo.

Second replay: You use blasters, once again I was impressed at the start. But then you OB for 3 with an ice troll and leak anyway. End up with 3 alchemists and an ice troll shaman. I, once again, disagree with the way you handled your build to adapt.

Third replay: You started with minotaur (which, imo, is not a viable starting tower). Then you added SoV to this build and it started to fail on lvl 3. I did not watch this any further for minotaur and SoV is not a viable build imo. Also, placement was questionable on this one too.

My conclusion is that you need a little more experience with builds before you can reapply to the LIHL. We will keep this application as denied at the present time.

Thanks for your interest and please look us up again once you feel you have progressed to the standards that we are looking for!

[eldryan]

yea, also apparently you went merc team against me, so go figure you seemed crafty.

[Crook]

yo man, valheru here. Im being shit on by the "pros", every game, every move, every lumber up, im hounded for. I agree i dont know the game like beep does, like goat does, like alot of people with game smarts do... i havent been around long enough to know. But we play some together man, and im telling ya, ud be blacklisted just like me if u were in lihl game. They will treat u like pub newb, and when u get a bad roll and leak a little, they will pause and try to draw game cuase of you... ducky = #1 in pub ent ELO... hes not healed in 2 games ive been in with him.... no1 says nothing. Its all about what ya name is in lihl.

I will say ur not a newb, and are a decent player. A few mistakes here n there ofc.. But everyone makes those, no matter ur skill level. But ud just be hated on if u were in lihl my friend

[iightfyre]

@Valheru

Im being shit on by the "pros", every game, every move, every lumber up, im hounded for.

I'm sorry that you feel this way. Are you being flamed or just being coached? (There is a big difference here imo)

They will treat u like pub newb, and when u get a bad roll and leak a little, they will pause and try to draw game cuase of you.

Did this happen to you? When?

ducky = #1 in pub ent ELO... hes not healed in 2 games ive been in with him.... no1 says nothing. Its all about what ya name is in lihl.

I don't think that it is all about your name. I don't want to bring up old topics but remember that Donald was "hated on" in pubs by a lot of the lihl players and yet he is in the league and plays with us. Reputation is not how we judge people in the lihl.

If you would like to discuss your experience with the lihl, Valheru, please do and I will be happy to help.
Thanks

[BeepBoopBeep]

Decision was made, Moving to denied.

Pm a moderator if you have anything else to say.