All players must build on their own lane, and cannot build a tower that will attack a creep from the opposite lane.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2635938
Mass delays on lvl 17 including occupy delaying mid for his ally...
Thought those lame plays were removed from lihl..but since his player 2 leaked into his delays ,i´d say this is clearly against the rule anyways...
Occupy delay for ally...
Moderator: LIHL Staff
-
- Aura Tree
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Occupy delay for ally...
i did not mean to delay for my ally and i did not build in DG area and im sorry if my delay affected my mates lane. But i do find this post kind of hilarious tho, you mad cause i farmed you 50 elo today? just bounce back bro and stop makin lame reports
and btw i have seen many games where units went to opposite build (if zeus build etc) its not a big deal, just things that happens sometimes, un-intentional
and btw i have seen many games where units went to opposite build (if zeus build etc) its not a big deal, just things that happens sometimes, un-intentional
-
- Treant
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Occupy delay for ally...
lame reports?
this is probably my 2nd or 3rd report since i started to play lihl half a year back, mainly because mass delays havent been seen in quite a long time, and then the fact that even With mass delay, u delayed for your ally, which clumps your leaks even more and goes slower to king, which is a clear break to the rule
"All players must build on their own lane, and cannot build a tower that will attack a creep from the opposite lane."
as people say, its a pro league
then take a chance to win fair without breaking and rules, the mass delay is just lame, but obviously its allowed, delaying mid lane for ur ally isnt tho.

"All players must build on their own lane, and cannot build a tower that will attack a creep from the opposite lane."
as people say, its a pro league

-
- Aura Tree
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Occupy delay for ally...
yea as i told you , my bad, i just wanted to delay for my lane tho, not for my ally. but w/e ban me if u want i got no energy to argue bout these pathetic things. over n out
-
- Treant
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Occupy delay for ally...
well, as i wrote to u on bnet, i´d rather post this thread about whoever the player was that came up with mass delay play, since my whole idea here was to bring up the discussion about mass delays, which is a lame play and i thought was more or less removed from lihl ( havent seen in ages), and then the problem was the only "rule" broken in that game was your units delaying allies creeps ( for units to go even more together and delayed @ mid which have been forbidden since several months back). Which was the reason i had to create a thread about that at the same time.
Obviously the only way to answer that was by goin to full offensive talk both on bnet then goin to offence about you farmed me today? 2 games? 30-40 elo? yeah, I would most likely be very mad about that, seems very realistic...
however feel free to keep the discussion alive about mass delays... (no need to discuss the delays on mid, Yes, by lookin at the rules, you are NOT allowed to build any unit that will attack creeps from other players, so by building @ mid you risk breaking that rule if your ally leaks faster then you)
Obviously the only way to answer that was by goin to full offensive talk both on bnet then goin to offence about you farmed me today? 2 games? 30-40 elo? yeah, I would most likely be very mad about that, seems very realistic...
however feel free to keep the discussion alive about mass delays... (no need to discuss the delays on mid, Yes, by lookin at the rules, you are NOT allowed to build any unit that will attack creeps from other players, so by building @ mid you risk breaking that rule if your ally leaks faster then you)
-
- Treant
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:12 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Occupy delay for ally...
and a little side not, I dont care if you get banned or not, which i also told u..even tho u were prolly to mad to even read what i wrote :S Wont post anymore in this thread after this message, but I hope we find out whats acceptable and whats not
, my own thoughts about it is delaying mid is a clear rule break If units from allies creeps hits it(been told by admins), and my other thought is mass delays to bug units to get stuck and delayed to reach king would possibly go under "Any use of game mechanics which results in a glitch or bug is forbidden." or something like that 


Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests