toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

oxidus
Resource Storage
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:12 am

toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby oxidus » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:38 am

Your battle.net username:oxidus
Violator's battle.net username:toomanybears
Game name (if known):[ent] dota arem us/ca #31
Bot name (for example, ENT15):ent38
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page):http://s2.clanent.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=808808.w3g
Rule player violated:Maphacking
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):26min into the game
Any further thoughts:He followed me when i was invis all most all the way to river it wasnt coincidence at all, he knew he could take me on i was really low but i was invis. Most of his movement seems really sketchy at least pudge was carryign wards so it could be the wards or maybe they got wards ont aht spot.
Attachments
808808.w3g
(276.53 KiB) Downloaded 34 times

User avatar
Nz.Death
Poison Treant
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Hell

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby Nz.Death » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:00 am

Id hate to say it but this is a really hard one, He never fogclicked at all though the whole game but when he chased you invis was dodgy, What makes it worse is when hes at your mid and and you come in, He trys not to but it shows he knows you are there.

I need someone to watch this aswel, I think he is maphacking but he is very good at hiding it. Ull see at 26:00 that he chase invis for abit but then backs off as he is invis!!!!!

And after that when they are raxing bane is watching as invis ursa comes up and gets nightmare ready for when he comes out of invis. Id say maphack but need a second opinion.
Image

User avatar
GhettoRhymes
Aura Tree
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:09 pm
Location: The Golden State

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby GhettoRhymes » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:11 am

This one is very very sketchy, first of all he constantly DOES MH but then DOES NOT (if that makes sense) I would consider it MH just to be safe, due to the fact that he his actions in game deem him of a MH'er trying to be very careful especially during the chase 26 minutes in.

-GR
-GR

Image

User avatar
Nz.Death
Poison Treant
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Hell

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby Nz.Death » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:56 am

Yea id agree, its a hard one to judge, but within 2 instantances he shows it very clearly without fog click or anything, Maybe just a very skilled hacking. For the admins to decide i think.
Image

User avatar
Nz.Death
Poison Treant
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Hell

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby Nz.Death » Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:42 pm

Need a second admin opinion thanks
Image

User avatar
ForMaDawgS
Treant Protector
Posts: 764
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
Location: San Antonio Tx

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby ForMaDawgS » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:02 am

honestly you cannot ban a player for just 1 game i'd say deny it for now add him to the and see if comes up again. or check he last few games.

Bubbles Edit: It's supposed to be on the down low, so let's not let everyone know about it.
Image

User avatar
Nz.Death
Poison Treant
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Hell

Re: toomanybears@useast.battle.net

Postby Nz.Death » Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:34 am

Denied moving to processed, Not enough evidence
Image


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests