[DOTA] [ID] [ENT] Dota apem us/ca #94

[Falcoholic]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 988698.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Dota apem us/ca #94
Your Warcraft III Username: HuMan)_ReSources
Violator's Warcraft III Username: desertisland
Violated Rule(s): Map Hacking
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Minutes 8 and 13
Any further thoughts: Violator used dust at random on two separate occasions to reveal an invisible ally.

[BeerLord]

No evidence for maphack in this instance. Did you by any chance check the replay first before submitting?
In the first incident you question, pudge had just tower dived to attempt to hook gondar, who managed to hit him with a shuriken before retreating. Pudge had 293 health when you (mirana) were visible coming up the river, and at that time gondar had also been visible returning in the direction of the top tower towards pudge's position when he went invisible. You were in his field of vision when u ulted and very close to him. So two invisible heros converging on him with 293 health. It was prudent to dust.

In the second incident pudge is in a team fight with nessaj, you, and clinks, with sniper and furion on his side. Clinks is visible, turns to pudge and shoots at him. Pudge turns away and clinks ww's and follows, moving around his position on the other side of the trees, where he becomes visible because there is a ward there.

Maybe u were influenced by blues comment at the beginning of the game. "Pudge might hak. His name sounds familiar". Kind of weak evidence to indict somebody.... But in any event I find prudent good play here, not the use of a third party program to enable true site.

[Jabba41]

Well, i cant explain it better then BeerLord. Pretty well done !

Denied.