Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 223819.w3g
Game Name: [ent] legion td mega #50
Your Warcraft III Username: SmegmaMountain
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Loganx2008@useast
Violated Rule(s): Game Ruin
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Start of game till 5 minutes in when we kicked him
Any further thoughts: I'm not sure what his deal was but he leaked rounds 1 and 2 heavily without us sending once. He kept bitching about game being stacked (which it was no doubt....not on purpose but it sure did happen). But that's besides the point you dont get to game ruin just because you dont like the match up. I asked his team if he was game runing they said yes and we kicked him out....
(04:54 / All) SmegmaMountain: how is red leaking....
(04:57 / All) SmegmaMountain: we haven't sent
(05:16 / All) Loganx2008: not really trying, my team has decided they want to play a 300+ greater deficit so why bother
[LTD] Loganx2008@useast
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:08 am
- Been thanked: 2 times
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: [LTD] Loganx2008@useast
0315 he sells his phantom.
Goes to wave 2 with 190 value.
Was kicked at wave 3.
This looks like a gray zone incident. On the one hand, he did send his tower and went wave 2 and 1 with crazy low value. On the other, he could just be new. And he did seem like a new player, which is no reason for a kick. In my opinion, this kick was rushed, and barely justified.
Unless there is history for similar reasons, he should not be banned.
Goes to wave 2 with 190 value.
Was kicked at wave 3.
This looks like a gray zone incident. On the one hand, he did send his tower and went wave 2 and 1 with crazy low value. On the other, he could just be new. And he did seem like a new player, which is no reason for a kick. In my opinion, this kick was rushed, and barely justified.
Unless there is history for similar reasons, he should not be banned.
-
- Poison Treant
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:16 am
- Location: Houston
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
Re: [LTD] Loganx2008@useast
Previous ban for not healing king in TK fashion.
Plus this:
(05:16 / All) Loganx2008: not really trying, my team has decided they want to play a 300+ greater deficit so why bother
Banning for five days for intentional gameruin.
Plus this:
(05:16 / All) Loganx2008: not really trying, my team has decided they want to play a 300+ greater deficit so why bother
Banning for five days for intentional gameruin.
Let's just play nice.
NOT!
NOT!
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests