Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9837284
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #6
Your Warcraft III Username: zamarok
Violator's Warcraft III Username: ner0@europe, dirtysocks@USEAST
Violated Rule(s): refusal to votekick afk, dirtysocks saved the game during a fight
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): replay, 33:30, ogre is afk at their mid lane while I'm right next to him and get ganked. Pink and I both are pushing mid rax thinking Ogre will help but he continues standing there. He's obviously afk and the other team knows it as seconds later, they kill him. 37:09, they are pushing and ogre is afk at fountain. We gave more than enough evidence that he was afk.
Any further thoughts: Ogre went afk right in front of their mid. Other team took advantage and killed him while we voted to kick. They said to wait for five minutes but Ogre reset or something as it was much longer than five minutes and we were not able to kick. They were also pushing at this time so we voted to kick him. They were making a comeback with ogre being afk so they took the opportunity to not kick.
The remaining sentinel players all voted but it seems that purple+blue were too excited in that they may be able to win the game if ogre went afk.
(37:31 / All) ZaMaRoK: k
(37:34 / All) ZaMaRoK: imma submit
(37:36 / All) ZaMaRoK: last warning
(37:42) p.s.g killed baqarkahan
(37:48 / All) ZaMaRoK: 36:00 refusal to vote
Warned them both after two failed attempts that a ban report would be issued. Blue+Purple still refused to votekick even though they knew ogre was afk.
(42:05 / All) DirtySocks: Player [DirtySocks] is saving the game.
(42:05 / Saving game ?) DirtySocks: Save game.
Blue also saves the game during a fight. Please add the duration of ban due to this.
Blue also claims he will file a report against me. Resort to this thread for all the evidence you need to deny that ban request. Thank you.
[DOTA] dirtysocks@USEast and Ner0@Europe
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:32 pm
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: [DOTA] dirtysocks@USEast and Ner0@Europe
I hate these kinds of BRQs, utter waste of time. You went 22-7 and won the game, what is the point of posting this BRQ especially when the player was eventually kicked minutes later?
At 32 min chat, Sentinels admit defeat:
(32:34 / All) DirtySocks: good game zama
Doesn't look like he has anything against you or he's trolling or mad.
At 33 min, less than 30 sec later you votekicked. (1st votekick)
(33:01 / Allied) ZaMaRoK: !votekick baq
Blue yesed it right there:
(33:38 / Allied) DirtySocks: !yes
(33:38 / All) DirtySocks: Player [DirtySocks] voted to kick player [baqarkahan]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
Looks like your own teammate didn't votekick: Brown.
At 34 min, 1st votekick expired. 2 mins later, at 36 min, 2nd votekick:
(36:10 / All) p.s.g: !votekick baq
Even your own teammates didn't vote again! Brown didn't vote. Expired at 37.09
At 37 min, you started another votekick.
(36:55 / All) ZaMaRoK: he moves
(36:59 / All) ZaMaRoK: he moved
(37:00 / All) ZaMaRoK: kick
This is solely your words, sentinels respond by checking. Which is typical. No one else provided more evidence.
(37:17 / All) DirtySocks: -afk
(37:24 / All) DirtySocks: -afk
TWO of your own teammates didn't vote. Brown and LB.
38 min, another votekick
(38:29 / All) avishay_robi: !votekick baq
(38:43 / All) DirtySocks: A votekick against player [baqarkahan] has passed.
It passed. Total time between 1st votekick and the player being kicked, FIVE lousy minutes.
So what is your problem? You like wasting admins time? You know why there are 4 pages of BRQs to go over? Because of ridiculous ones like this one.
At 32 min chat, Sentinels admit defeat:
(32:34 / All) DirtySocks: good game zama
Doesn't look like he has anything against you or he's trolling or mad.
At 33 min, less than 30 sec later you votekicked. (1st votekick)
(33:01 / Allied) ZaMaRoK: !votekick baq
Blue yesed it right there:
(33:38 / Allied) DirtySocks: !yes
(33:38 / All) DirtySocks: Player [DirtySocks] voted to kick player [baqarkahan]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
Looks like your own teammate didn't votekick: Brown.
At 34 min, 1st votekick expired. 2 mins later, at 36 min, 2nd votekick:
(36:10 / All) p.s.g: !votekick baq
Even your own teammates didn't vote again! Brown didn't vote. Expired at 37.09
At 37 min, you started another votekick.
(36:55 / All) ZaMaRoK: he moves
(36:59 / All) ZaMaRoK: he moved
(37:00 / All) ZaMaRoK: kick
This is solely your words, sentinels respond by checking. Which is typical. No one else provided more evidence.
(37:17 / All) DirtySocks: -afk
(37:24 / All) DirtySocks: -afk
TWO of your own teammates didn't vote. Brown and LB.
38 min, another votekick
(38:29 / All) avishay_robi: !votekick baq
(38:43 / All) DirtySocks: A votekick against player [baqarkahan] has passed.
It passed. Total time between 1st votekick and the player being kicked, FIVE lousy minutes.
So what is your problem? You like wasting admins time? You know why there are 4 pages of BRQs to go over? Because of ridiculous ones like this one.
- DOTA_TRASHCANS
- Treant
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:27 pm
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: [DOTA] dirtysocks@USEast and Ner0@Europe
This is a rough one. If a ban req is made, Admins will review it. They only ban if a rule has been broken.
<3 Trashcans
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
- Has thanked: 219 times
- Been thanked: 249 times
Re: [DOTA] dirtysocks@USEast and Ner0@Europe
@nitromon
Did he or did he not refuse to votekick someone who was afk?
Did he or did he not save the game during a fight?
If you hate this BRQ so much, why are you here typing a college essay? Your logic is horrible.
"You won the game. Why are you posting this; to waste the admin's time?"
So I can only report someone if I lose? Define your logic. Those five lousy minutes were five minutes in which we could have lost the game as they got our mid rax. If you didn't watch the game, why are you commenting on it? Oh, that's right. Because you think you're Judge Judy.
Btw, thanks for mentioning the others that didn't vote. I'll add them to the ban request and waste more admin's time. Thanks, you're a true sport.
Did he or did he not refuse to votekick someone who was afk?
Did he or did he not save the game during a fight?
If you hate this BRQ so much, why are you here typing a college essay? Your logic is horrible.
"You won the game. Why are you posting this; to waste the admin's time?"
So I can only report someone if I lose? Define your logic. Those five lousy minutes were five minutes in which we could have lost the game as they got our mid rax. If you didn't watch the game, why are you commenting on it? Oh, that's right. Because you think you're Judge Judy.
Btw, thanks for mentioning the others that didn't vote. I'll add them to the ban request and waste more admin's time. Thanks, you're a true sport.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] dirtysocks@USEast and Ner0@Europe
Prolonged afk confirmed.
baqarkahan banned 3 days for afk.
Multiple votekick attempts made.
dirtysocks failed to vote on the last 3 attempts, and also used save in the middle of a fight, and is banned 2 days for failure to vk game ruiner/pause/save abuse.
(42:05 / All) DirtySocks: Player [DirtySocks] is saving the game.
(42:05 / Saving game ?) DirtySocks: Save game.
Ner0 failed to vote on any of the attempts and is banned 2 days for failure to votekick game ruiner.
baqarkahan banned 3 days for afk.
Multiple votekick attempts made.
dirtysocks failed to vote on the last 3 attempts, and also used save in the middle of a fight, and is banned 2 days for failure to vk game ruiner/pause/save abuse.
(42:05 / All) DirtySocks: Player [DirtySocks] is saving the game.
(42:05 / Saving game ?) DirtySocks: Save game.
Ner0 failed to vote on any of the attempts and is banned 2 days for failure to votekick game ruiner.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests