xxDragoonxx@Europe

Thank you for applying.
User avatar
QTriNitY
Donator
Posts: 1773
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:05 pm

Re: xxDragoonxx@Europe

Postby QTriNitY » Sat Jun 08, 2013 6:36 am

xxDragooonxx, please consider EOC's recommendation. He is trying to help you.

NmD wrote:Warcraft III username: ilaugh
Realm:useast
Gamename:NO GAMENAME LISTED
Bot username:??
Situation:Some kid in game started a kick for an obnoxious player. I voted to kick him. A kid on other team decided to act like a prick and say he was gonna an everyone who voted to kick the kid. I called him out and told him to ******. apparently he submitted ban request. says I was banned by "edgeofchaos" who I will be submitting a complaint for his removal of moderator status. Moderator abuse is Much worse than votekick abuse. And I didn't even start the kick. Just cant stand kids trying to act billy badass online b/c they think the have some control. I was planning on donating to ent soon but if I continue to get banned by punks whi think they r cool I will not be.
Why you should be unbanned: I was wrongly banned.


There are a few key points in this Appeal which you can assist ilaugh to understand his ban. r-l_l-i-l_l-p was the Target of the votekick incident.


1. A kid on other team decided to act like a prick and say he was gonna an everyone who voted to kick the kid
Having him said this, you can address the votekick incident.
Watch the replay (Do not just depend on Chat Log) and you can see that ilaugh was bitter about the clash which had him killed when r-l_l-i-l_l-p was not with the team.
You can say things like r-l_l-i-l_l-p was pushing Top lane and attempting to down tower. Thus, the votekick on r-l_l-i-l_l-p was not substantiated.

[spoiler=]Image
Image
Image
Image
Image[/spoiler]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. I was banned by "edgeofchaos" who I will be submitting a complaint for his removal of moderator status.
You may state your opinion if the ban was well warranted or otherwise. E.g. Personally I agree with the Admin who proceeded with a minor ban because you voted.

[spoiler=]Image[/spoiler]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Tell ilaugh that he is not the only one penalized in this scenario, the Initiator was also banned for errorneously trying to votekick a player who showed no signs of Game Ruining.

EdgeOfChaos wrote:Both banned for 1 day. Thanks for reporting.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Lastly, educate ilaugh on what constitutes Game Ruining. Say things like - the person he was voting off did not intentionally suicide, afk, item destroy, etc. Thus there should not be any reason to vote kick this player.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: xxDragoonxx@Europe

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Jun 08, 2013 2:27 pm

Posting stats or any other information from the sites (except game/chat log) is kinda useless because every staff member has to check that anyway.

So it doesn't help much.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
BeepBoopBeep
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:23 pm
Location: Australia!
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: xxDragoonxx@Europe

Postby BeepBoopBeep » Sun Jun 09, 2013 11:06 am

Your application is impressive, you are very active in ban appeals & requests where a moderator should be therefor you have my support.

Most active forum:
Processed appeals
(47 Posts / 43.52% of user’s posts)

Always good to see this;

Take in what others have said, there advice is only trying to help you for the position your applying for.

Like i said before you have my Support, Good luck.

ncsangung
Aura Tree
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:01 pm

Re: xxDragoonxx@Europe

Postby ncsangung » Sun Jun 09, 2013 3:53 pm

man ! i need to be more active too ! good luck on your application!

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: xxDragoonxx@Europe

Postby aRt)Y » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:50 am

BeepBoopBeep wrote:Your application is impressive, you are very active in ban appeals & requests

I can't repeat it often enough. Quality != quantity. If he would be useful for the public as well, then yes.
However, the best example is probably this: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9590

Plus, from what I see you've got 5 requests only from which 1 got denied for lack of evidence/delayed click.

I am not trying to make you look bad but for me, personally, you are lacking something specific to be good at this job. Everyone probably agrees with me that all pubs can be active on the forum and copy/paste information - yet, it doesn't make them a good staff member.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Processed Applications”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests