Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/11688227/
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #82
Your Warcraft III Username: boulevard
Violator's Warcraft III Username: mr_darcy
Violated Rule(s): constantly flames
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): throughout all game , timestamping below
Any further thoughts:
(21:30 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: fuck u
(34:08 / All) Mr_Darcy: fuck u meepo player
(34:12 / All) Mr_Darcy: fuckin2g troll
(34:57 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: IDIOTS
(40:01 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: IDIOTS
(40:05 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: fucking retards
(41:26 / All) Mr_Darcy: fucking troll
(44:58 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: u fuckers
(47:03 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: uidiots
(48:26 / All) Mr_Darcy: but ya'll are pathetic trolls
(50:08 / All) Mr_Darcy: suckers
(57:25 / All) Mr_Darcy: troll fuckers
As you can see kid wont stop insulting his team also in all chat, to everybody.
I'd also like to point out another game previous to this one and he has the same attitude (I didn't participate in this game but just to show his overall attitude), below link with timestamps as well ;
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11688002
(08:33 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCK U
(13:09 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: WHERE IS FUCKING4TEAM
(13:11 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCK U8
(13:16 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: OI FARM ALL GAME
(13:19 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKING NABS
(13:26 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: no fucking map awareness
(14:09 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: fuck u
(14:14 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: i dont g4ive a shit
(15:50 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: die fuckers
(30:42 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKERS
(30:44 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FARM ALL GAME
(30:46 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: DUMB FUCKS
(30:54 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: NOOBS
(31:07 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: BUT I DONT GIVE AF UCK
(35:39 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: dumbass
(52:12 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKERS
(52:24 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKING PUSSIES
(56:27 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: fucking nabs
(56:32 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: GO FUCK YOURSELF
(56:40 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKING TARDS
(56:56 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: DIE IDIOTS
(57:03 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: FUCKERS
(57:17 / Allied) Mr_Darcy: GO KILL YOU8SELVES
Overall kid's attitude is really toxic , he wont stop insulting.
P.S: @Tulkas I don't mind to have lost that game , I'm not reporting you for that , I just got annoyed of your attitude , I've played with you a few times and you are always like this. You need a break , I had one and now I don't flame so much...
EDIT: also Tulkas , you are reporting other players here frequently and you're well acquainted with rules , so you know that flaming that way someday can lead you to a ban.
[DOTA] mr.darcy entconnect
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 am
- Location: Usa
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: [DOTA] mr.darcy entconnect
I fully deserve the ban, and on occasion I do flame. Though not nearly as much as I've done the past. It was a problem. A few slip here and there tho.
There are just some triggers. The fact that a new account, waits until all players select heros, then selects meepo at the end... that's just a major trigger for me. I like to play fair, balanced games, knowing what to expect when I join a game, so I have the choice of leaving or not when I enter lobby. When a new account picks meepo last, that threw me off the edge.
I apologize for flaming. I should show more respect. But man, sometimes there are just triggers.
I'll accept whatever ban is given to me. I'll keep posting tho. Cuz I think it's a great tool for attempting to keep games enjoyable, fair, honest, and yes, free of excessive insulting.
There are just some triggers. The fact that a new account, waits until all players select heros, then selects meepo at the end... that's just a major trigger for me. I like to play fair, balanced games, knowing what to expect when I join a game, so I have the choice of leaving or not when I enter lobby. When a new account picks meepo last, that threw me off the edge.
I apologize for flaming. I should show more respect. But man, sometimes there are just triggers.
I'll accept whatever ban is given to me. I'll keep posting tho. Cuz I think it's a great tool for attempting to keep games enjoyable, fair, honest, and yes, free of excessive insulting.
Re: [DOTA] mr.darcy entconnect
Also, I've been wanting to say this for awhile cuz it's a major peeve of mine, but allowing multiple accounts on ENT I feel really damages DOTA. Maybe nothing can be done about this.
But players like CreepyNoob, who are good players, that create new accounts excessively, contribute to vastly lowering the quality of the game. You don't know the quality of player of a new account, and when they end up being fairly good, it can throw off the whole balance of the game. The balance of the game is not the major issue. The real issue is not being able to CHOOSE what general type of game to expect (stacked, underdog, fairly balanced, etc.). And then, you have a good player with a new account do a trollish thing like pick meepo, the most OP hero in the game, after everyone else has picked... and yea, you're going to piss some people off.
A simple fix, if possible, is just allow only one account, per email, or something like that. Again, I don't know if anything can be done.
This is not justification for flaming. But I do want to bring awareness that people are taking advantage of the system and lowering the quality of the game, if not flat-out ruining games altogether, which should naturally cause some lashback.
But players like CreepyNoob, who are good players, that create new accounts excessively, contribute to vastly lowering the quality of the game. You don't know the quality of player of a new account, and when they end up being fairly good, it can throw off the whole balance of the game. The balance of the game is not the major issue. The real issue is not being able to CHOOSE what general type of game to expect (stacked, underdog, fairly balanced, etc.). And then, you have a good player with a new account do a trollish thing like pick meepo, the most OP hero in the game, after everyone else has picked... and yea, you're going to piss some people off.
A simple fix, if possible, is just allow only one account, per email, or something like that. Again, I don't know if anything can be done.
This is not justification for flaming. But I do want to bring awareness that people are taking advantage of the system and lowering the quality of the game, if not flat-out ruining games altogether, which should naturally cause some lashback.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 am
- Location: Usa
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: [DOTA] mr.darcy entconnect
I do understand you , and I do agree with you on your point, I myself had stop playing with main account for that.
But the second game there were not new accounts nor lastpicks that can induce you to flame that way.
You said that you are not justifying your actions with that , but it pretty much seems afterall that you are 'cause then what's the explanation for the second game posted? no new accounts, no meepo, you simply lost and raged to your teammates.
But the second game there were not new accounts nor lastpicks that can induce you to flame that way.
You said that you are not justifying your actions with that , but it pretty much seems afterall that you are 'cause then what's the explanation for the second game posted? no new accounts, no meepo, you simply lost and raged to your teammates.
Re: [DOTA] mr.darcy entconnect
I just said that I don't justify my flaming. I said I'll take whatever ban I get.
Just because I explained how some activity can lead to lashback such as flaming does not equate to the flaming being justified. It's kindergarten stuff. A kids insults you, you hit the kid back. Yea, there is a reason for hitting the kid, but is it right? No.
You're insulting be my trying to deduce that I was insincere.
As for the second game, it was just another trigger. One expects team members to help in very basic ways, and when they don't, or don't even try, that's very frustrating. Again it's a rationale for why the flaming occurred, but not a justification.
Just because I explained how some activity can lead to lashback such as flaming does not equate to the flaming being justified. It's kindergarten stuff. A kids insults you, you hit the kid back. Yea, there is a reason for hitting the kid, but is it right? No.
You're insulting be my trying to deduce that I was insincere.
As for the second game, it was just another trigger. One expects team members to help in very basic ways, and when they don't, or don't even try, that's very frustrating. Again it's a rationale for why the flaming occurred, but not a justification.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests